Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lea Ma vs Saumya Vig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ma vs Vig analysis and find out who is favored!
Lea Ma vs Saumya Vig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ma 0 - 0 Vig
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ma has won 46.06% of points on their second serve, while Vig has won 41.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ma, in recent form, has won 61.03% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vig has won 53.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.62% and 32.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ma has saved 54.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vig has saved 49.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ma has won 65.52% of matches played (W/L 38/ 20), with Vig winning 35.14% (W/L 13/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ma has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 30/ 20). Vig has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 30% (W/L 45/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ma has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 38/ 20), where as Vig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.1% of matches (W/L 8/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ma has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.88 while Vig has played against players with an average rank of 93.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ma has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vig has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ma has converted 54.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vig has converted 33.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
522
Rank
522
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
61% (44-28)
Career Total W/L
29% (65-156)
66% (19-10)
YTD W/L
29% (5-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lea Ma vs Saumya Vig For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ma VS Vig
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lea Ma | Saumya Vig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (19/10) | 29% (5/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (40/19) | 29% (12/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (308/228) | 41% (163/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 31% (4/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:55 | 1:29:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218 | 115.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (943/1591) | 59% (599/1013) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (602/943) | 53% (320/599) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (298/647) | 42% (172/414) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (119/220) | 33% (38/116) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (807/1641) | 42% (416/1002) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 66% (19/10) | 33% (4/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (19/25) | 29% (5/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 20% (15/3) |
Lea Ma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Lea Ma
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
50%
(
37 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
69
|
0-6 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Cadence Brace
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-0 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Maribella Zamarripa
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Mary Boyce Deatherage
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Lea Ma
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Alexandra Bozovic
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Anna Ulyashchenko
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Shuo Feng
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Lea Ma
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
51%
(
24 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
39
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Saumya Vig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christasha McNeil
Player
Saumya Vig
41%
(
19 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Saumya Vig
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
18
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandra Bozovic
Player
Saumya Vig
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Emma Van Poppel
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
1
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Gogulina
Player
Saumya Vig
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
1
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
5
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
52 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Saumya Vig
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Yashina
Player
Saumya Vig
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Abhaya Vemuri
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Ma Vs Vig Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ma are available here and Vig photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
